What is the primary difference between "encapsulation" and "removal" regarding asbestos management?

The primary difference between encapsulation and removal in asbestos management lies in the approaches taken to handle asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). Encapsulation refers to the method of sealing or coating the ACMs to prevent the release of asbestos fibers into the air. This technique is often used when the ACMs are in good condition and not likely to be disturbed, providing a safer alternative to address the risk of asbestos exposure.

On the other hand, removal involves physically taking out and disposing of the ACMs from the building entirely. This process can be more invasive, often requiring extensive safety measures to protect workers and occupants from airborne asbestos fibers during the removal process.

By stating that encapsulation seals ACMs to prevent fiber release while removal eliminates them completely, it clearly differentiates the two strategies based on their fundamental goals and methods. This distinction is vital for understanding which approach is appropriate in different situations, such as based on the condition of the asbestos and the building's use.

The other options don't accurately capture the core difference: encapsulation can be either more or less costly depending on various factors, it is applicable in various types of buildings beyond just residential, and the dangers associated with removal versus encapsulation depend on specific circumstances rather than being universally true.